Friday, March 29, 2013

What Happens in Vegas...

I just got back from a trip to Las Vegas with my mom and sister. These are my sketches from the trip!



The above drawings are from a Gospel Brunch we went to at the House of Blues-- live gospel singers and an all you can eat buffet of traditional Southern food. 
Oh, Vegas!

The following are drawings of kitchy slot machines. I thought they were absolutely hilarious. They were everywhere and they were absurd. There was an array of themes-- in addition to the classic poker chip and royal flush illustrations, I saw bears, wolves, sharks, hunting, ducks, sexy witches, sexy priestesses, sexy Egyptians, sexy ninja ladies, sexy assassins, lucky Asian dragons, buffalo, an old man with droopy jowls and a pile of leaves and a rake "raking" in the cash, Star Trek, Lord of the Rings, Sex in the City, Michael Jackson.. I made it my mission to find the most ridiculous kitchy slot machine and I found it... 
Are you ready? It was called:
Puppy Stampede!!!!


Slot machines aside, I drew the drive to the Strip:

 

And Red Rock Canyon:

Friday, March 15, 2013

Project Fox Bed and Why I Don't Paint Flowers

I have had a project in mind for a while and I finally have the time to devote to it: I bought a secondhand bed frame at a thrift store. I was very excited because it was both ugly and boring. This means that it was both a blank canvas and I would have no qualms covering it in paint. I knew I wanted to paint something on my bed but I didn't know what. 

After a lot of thought, I decided on foxes. I don't entirely know why. There just needed to be foxes on this bed. I went as far as to look up foxes in a dictionary of Jungian/dream symbols. They don't seem to correlate to my life in any way, except that I am painting them. Painting foxes onto my bed is what I have been doing for the last two days and here are some photos of my progress!




I usually don't depict flowers in any of my artwork. They don't interest me because they are too pretty. Flowers seem to me like a shortcut to making your painting pretty and I am interested in finding beauty in things that people don't necessarily find beautiful already. This is why I don't love Georgia O'Keeffe's flower paintings. She was all, "people don't stop to notice flowers so I painted giant flowers so that everyone is forced to stop and look at flowers." And I am like, "No! Everyone thinks flowers are pretty! They are like the most generically pretty thing there is!" So I am usually not interested in painting them.

(Though to clarify, I am a big fan of Georgia O'keeffe. Her desert paintings rock my world and there is this GIANT canvas she did of clouds that is in the Chicago Art Institute that totally blew my mind. ALSO I came across a book once that quoted her as saying, "I hate flowers! I paint them because they are cheaper than models and they don't move." So perhaps her artist statement about getting people to notice beautiful little things is not the whole story).

That being said, you will notice that my foxes are surrounded by dandelions. For me, dandelions are the exception to my no-flower rule. I think it is because when they are white and puffy, they don't even look like flowers any more. They look like surreal floating fluff balls. They look like stars. They look like they have some sort of internal luminescence coupled with transparency. They are also weeds, which are traditionally seen as "not pretty." So dandelions are ok with me.







I am working on both sides of the headboard next, which you will never even see because it will always be behind pillows or against a wall, but this bed needs more foxes.

I could do this forever. Anyone want paintings on their furniture?

Tuesday, March 12, 2013

Vinceward Van Hopper! Edwincent Hop-Gogh?

Hey all,

First-- a quick update on my screen printing class last night: It was SO much better! I am finally getting it! I finished the background of my print and moved on to the ship itself. The sails are done and next I will move down to the hull and eventually the water. And all the rigging-- I'll need to throw that in somewhere. I learned a new way to register each piece of paper (line it up correctly with the screen) and it made my life a bajillion-million times easier. Still no images for you though. Sorry!!

What I am going to write about in this post is a painting that I have in the works-- a new nightscape in oil on wood panel. I am thinking of it as Van Gogh meets Edward Hopper. I'm borrowing from the color palette of Van Gogh's nightscapes and using classic New England Architecture as subject matter-- the same subject matter that Hopper is known for (my work has been compared to his before and I take it as a huge compliment... though admittedly when I first moved to Boston, I had a bit of an artist block because I realized that Edward Hopper had already made all the paintings I wanted to make, so I had to shift in new ways).

So here is what I have so far:


Eh? Eh? Cool, right? Vinceward Van Hopper! Edwincent Hop-Gogh? 
No, no, the first one is better. Vinceward Van Hopper.


So what I am debating about right now, is 1) I want to finish this painting BUT 2) it looks kind of cool unfinished, am I right? There is something appealing about the sketchy boldness of the shapes I already have. I don't think I'll actually leave it like this, but a small part of me wants to. What do y'all think?

Oh and also, this isn't just any old house in Boston. This is MY house. My room is the one on the third floor balcony.